Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Chen Yu <> | Subject | [PATCH][v2] PM / s2idle: Clear _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG before suspend to idle | Date | Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:04:42 +0800 |
| |
Suspend to idle was found to not work on Goldmont CPU recently. And the issue was triggered due to:
1. On Goldmont the CPU in idle can only be woken up via IPIs, not POLLING mode: Commit 08e237fa56a1 ("x86/cpu: Add workaround for MONITOR instruction erratum on Goldmont based CPUs") 2. When the CPU is entering suspend to idle process, the _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is kept on, due to cpuidle_enter_s2idle() doesn't properly match call_cpuidle(). 3. Commit b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()") makes use of _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG to avoid sending IPIs to idle CPUs. 4. As a result, some IPIs related functions might not work well during suspend to idle on Goldmont. For example, one suspected victim: tick_unfreeze() -> timekeeping_resume() -> hrtimers_resume() -> clock_was_set() -> on_each_cpu() might wait forever, because the IPIs will not be sent to the CPUs which are sleeping with _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG set, and Goldmont CPU could not be woken up by only setting _TIF_NEED_RESCHED on the monitor address.
I don't find a way in Ubuntu to update the firmware of Goldmont and check if the issue was gone, a fix patch would do no harm. Clear the _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG flag before entering suspend to idle, and let the driver's enter_s2idle() to decide whether to set _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG or not. So that to avoid the scenario described above and keep the context consistent with before. Also adjust the naming to be consistent with call_cpuidle().
Fixes: b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> --- v2: According to Peter's review, v1 is racy, if someone already set TIF_NEED_RESCHED this patch just clear POLLING and go to sleep. Check TIF_NEED_RESCHED before entering suspend to idle and adjust the naming to be consistent with call_cpuidle(). -- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c index c149d9e20dfd..b003767abebd 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include <linux/mutex.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/sched/clock.h> +#include <linux/sched/idle.h> #include <linux/notifier.h> #include <linux/pm_qos.h> #include <linux/cpu.h> @@ -133,8 +134,8 @@ int cpuidle_find_deepest_state(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, } #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND -static void enter_s2idle_proper(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, - struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) +static void s2idle_enter(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, + struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) { ktime_t time_start, time_end; @@ -168,6 +169,15 @@ static void enter_s2idle_proper(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, dev->states_usage[index].s2idle_usage++; } +static int call_s2idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev, + int index) +{ + if (!current_clr_polling_and_test()) + s2idle_enter(drv, dev, index); + + return index; +} + /** * cpuidle_enter_s2idle - Enter an idle state suitable for suspend-to-idle. * @drv: cpuidle driver for the given CPU. @@ -187,7 +197,7 @@ int cpuidle_enter_s2idle(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev) */ index = find_deepest_state(drv, dev, U64_MAX, 0, true); if (index > 0) - enter_s2idle_proper(drv, dev, index); + call_s2idle(drv, dev, index); return index; } -- 2.17.1
| |