Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Zhouyi Zhou <> | Subject | [PATCH] RCU: fix a typo in comments of rcu_blocking_is_gp | Date | Thu, 15 Oct 2020 03:53:03 +0000 |
| |
There is a tiny typo in comment of function rcu_blocking_is_gp.
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com> --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index f78ee75..4cca03f 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -3512,7 +3512,7 @@ void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void) * During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically * implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPTION. * - * Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any + * However, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPTION, any * blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if * there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of * either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to -- 1.7.1
| |