Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 7 Aug 2019 21:38:11 -0500 | From | "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <> | Subject | [PATCH] ARM: ep93xx: Mark expected switch fall-through |
| |
Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
Fix the following warnings (Building: arm-ep93xx_defconfig arm):
arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c: In function 'crunch_do': arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:46:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] memset(crunch_state, 0, sizeof(*crunch_state)); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c:53:2: note: here case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: ^~~~
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c index 1c9a4be8b503..1c05c5bf7e5c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static int crunch_do(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *t) * FALLTHROUGH: Ensure we don't try to overwrite our newly * initialised state information on the first fault. */ + /* Fall through */ case THREAD_NOTIFY_EXIT: crunch_task_release(thread); -- 2.22.0
| |