lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch 32/44] posix-cpu-timers: Provide array based sample functions
Instead of using task_cputime and doing the addition of utime and stime at
all call sites, it's way simpler to have a sample array which allows
indexed based checks against the expiry cache array.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -195,6 +195,32 @@ static u64 cpu_clock_sample(const clocki
return 0;
}

+static inline void store_samples(u64 *samples, u64 stime, u64 utime, u64 rtime)
+{
+ samples[CPUCLOCK_PROF] = stime + utime;
+ samples[CPUCLOCK_VIRT] = utime;
+ samples[CPUCLOCK_SCHED] = rtime;
+}
+
+static void task_sample_cputime(struct task_struct *p, u64 *samples)
+{
+ u64 stime, utime;
+
+ task_cputime(p, &utime, &stime);
+ store_samples(samples, stime, utime, p->se.sum_exec_runtime);
+}
+
+static void proc_sample_cputime_atomic(struct task_cputime_atomic *at,
+ u64 *samples)
+{
+ u64 stime, utime, rtime;
+
+ utime = atomic64_read(&at->utime);
+ stime = atomic64_read(&at->stime);
+ rtime = atomic64_read(&at->sum_exec_runtime);
+ store_samples(samples, stime, utime, rtime);
+}
+
/*
* Set cputime to sum_cputime if sum_cputime > cputime. Use cmpxchg
* to avoid race conditions with concurrent updates to cputime.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-08-19 17:56    [W:0.382 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site