| Subject | Re: [PATCHv5 04/19] mm/page_alloc: Unify alloc_hugepage_vma() | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2018 10:43:08 -0700 |
| |
A grammar error or two is probably OK in these descriptions, but these are just riddled with them in a way that makes them hard to read. Suggestions below.
On 07/17/2018 04:20 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > We don't need to have separate implementations of alloc_hugepage_vma() > for NUMA and non-NUMA. Using variant based on alloc_pages_vma() we would > cover both cases.
"Using the"
> This is preparation patch for allocation encrypted pages.
"a preparation"
"allocation encrypted pages" -> "allocation of encrypted pages" or "allocation encrypted pages" -> "allocating encrypted pages" or
> alloc_pages_vma() will handle allocation of encrypted pages. With this > change we don' t need to cover alloc_hugepage_vma() separately.
"don' t" -> "don't"
> The change makes typo in Alpha's implementation of
"a typo"
|