lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Andrey Ryabinin
<aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 01:11 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Add arch_ prefix to all atomic operations and include
>> <asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h>. This will allow
>> to add KASAN instrumentation to all atomic ops.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
>> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: x86@kernel.org
>>
>> ---
>
>
>
>
>> -static __always_inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
>> +static __always_inline void arch_atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
>> {
>> + /*
>> + * We could use WRITE_ONCE_NOCHECK() if it exists, similar to
>> + * READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() in arch_atomic_read(). But there is no such
>> + * thing at the moment, and introducing it for this case does not
>> + * worth it.
>> + */
>
>
> I'd rather remove this comment. I woudn't say that WRITE_ONCE() here looks confusing
> and needs comment. Also there is no READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() in arch_atomic_read() anymore.

Done.
It also should have gone to the patch that adds comments.


> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
>
>> WRITE_ONCE(v->counter, i);
>> }

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-06-17 11:18    [W:0.258 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site