Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:34:14 -0700 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: watchdog: f71808e_wdt: mark expected switch fall-throughs |
| |
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 02:28:17PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper > "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> --- > drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c > index 8658dba..e0678c1 100644 > --- a/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/f71808e_wdt.c > @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > > if (new_options & WDIOS_ENABLECARD) > return watchdog_start(); > - > + /* fall through */ > > case WDIOC_KEEPALIVE: > watchdog_keepalive(); > @@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ static long watchdog_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, > return -EINVAL; > > watchdog_keepalive(); > - /* Fall */ > + /* fall through */ > > case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT: > return put_user(watchdog.timeout, uarg.i);
| |