lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2017]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectSRCU's apparent use of NR_CPUS? [was: re: dm: allocate struct mapped_device with kvzalloc]
[cc'ing Paul, and LKML, to get his/others' take on SRCU cpu scaling]

On Tue, Oct 31 2017 at 7:33pm -0400,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:

> The structure srcu_struct can be very big, its size is proportional to the
> value CONFIG_NR_CPUS. The Fedora kernel has CONFIG_NR_CPUS 8192, the field
> io_barrier in the struct mapped_device has 84kB in the debugging kernel
> and 50kB in the non-debugging kernel. The large size may result in failure
> of the function kzalloc_node.
>
> In order to avoid the allocation failure, we use the function
> kvzalloc_node, this function falls back to vmalloc if a large contiguous
> chunk of memory is not available. This patch also moves the field
> io_barrier to the last position of struct mapped_device - the reason is
> that on many processor architectures, short memory offsets result in
> smaller code than long memory offsets - on x86-64 it reduces code size by
> 320 bytes.
>
> Note to stable kernel maintainers - the kernels 4.11 and older don't have
> the function kvzalloc_node, you can use the function vzalloc_node instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

This looks reasonable as a near-term workaround.. BUT:
Paul has there been any discussion about how to make SRCU support
dynamically scaling up to NR_CPUS maximum as 'nr_cpus' changes (rather
than accounting for worst case of NR_CPUS up-front)?

(But I had a quick look at scrutree.h and I'm not seeing explicit use of
NR_CPUS, so it is likely occuring via implicit percpu through some
member of 'struct srcu_struct', e.g. 'sda'?)

Thanks,
Mike

>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-core.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/md/dm.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm-core.h
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ struct dm_kobject_holder {
> * DM targets must _not_ deference a mapped_device to directly access its members!
> */
> struct mapped_device {
> - struct srcu_struct io_barrier;
> struct mutex suspend_lock;
>
> /*
> @@ -127,6 +126,8 @@ struct mapped_device {
> struct blk_mq_tag_set *tag_set;
> bool use_blk_mq:1;
> bool init_tio_pdu:1;
> +
> + struct srcu_struct io_barrier;
> };
>
> void dm_init_md_queue(struct mapped_device *md);
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ static struct mapped_device *alloc_dev(i
> struct mapped_device *md;
> void *old_md;
>
> - md = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*md), GFP_KERNEL, numa_node_id);
> + md = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*md), GFP_KERNEL, numa_node_id);
> if (!md) {
> DMWARN("unable to allocate device, out of memory.");
> return NULL;
> @@ -1795,7 +1795,7 @@ bad_io_barrier:
> bad_minor:
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> bad_module_get:
> - kfree(md);
> + kvfree(md);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -1814,7 +1814,7 @@ static void free_dev(struct mapped_devic
> free_minor(minor);
>
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> - kfree(md);
> + kvfree(md);
> }
>
> static void __bind_mempools(struct mapped_device *md, struct dm_table *t)

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2017-11-01 16:49    [W:1.263 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site