Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:18:07 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] Greybus driver subsystem for 4.9-rc1 |
| |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 08:05:19AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:45:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Sending a pull request for code that's never been seen upstream seems > > completely premature.
> Hey, how does code get upstream then? :)
By having the actual code to the mailing list.
> As for the drivers all living under drivers/greybus/ I understand, but > we need the greybus core present first before we can get the drivers in. > How about we do what happened with IIO, we take the greybus core code in > drivers/greybus/ and put the drivers in staging, and then move them out > of staging into the "real" portion of the kernel as they get reviewed > and accepted?
Yes, staging would be appropriate for unreviewed code. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |