Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Geliang Tang <> | Subject | [PATCH] proc: use rb_entry() | Date | Mon, 19 Dec 2016 23:11:12 +0800 |
| |
To make the code clearer, use rb_entry() instead of container_of() to deal with rbtree.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com> --- fs/proc/generic.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c index 7eb3cef..f842650 100644 --- a/fs/proc/generic.c +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c @@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ static struct proc_dir_entry *pde_subdir_find(struct proc_dir_entry *dir, struct rb_node *node = dir->subdir.rb_node; while (node) { - struct proc_dir_entry *de = container_of(node, - struct proc_dir_entry, - subdir_node); + struct proc_dir_entry *de = rb_entry(node, + struct proc_dir_entry, + subdir_node); int result = proc_match(len, name, de); if (result < 0) @@ -80,8 +80,9 @@ static bool pde_subdir_insert(struct proc_dir_entry *dir, /* Figure out where to put new node */ while (*new) { - struct proc_dir_entry *this = - container_of(*new, struct proc_dir_entry, subdir_node); + struct proc_dir_entry *this = rb_entry(*new, + struct proc_dir_entry, + subdir_node); int result = proc_match(de->namelen, de->name, this); parent = *new; -- 2.9.3
| |