lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs SMP86xx interrupt controller
On 19/11/15 18:33, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This adds support for the secondary interrupt controller used in Sigma
> Designs SMP86xx and SMP87xx chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 5 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-tangox.c | 232 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 238 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-tangox.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 4d7294e..baf3345 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -193,3 +193,8 @@ config IRQ_MXS
> def_bool y if MACH_ASM9260 || ARCH_MXS
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> select STMP_DEVICE
> +
> +config TANGOX_IRQ
> + bool
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> + select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> index 177f78f..763715c 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Makefile
> @@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RENESAS_H8S_INTC) += irq-renesas-h8s.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100) += irq-sa11x0.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_INGENIC_IRQ) += irq-ingenic.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_GPCV2) += irq-imx-gpcv2.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TANGOX_IRQ) += irq-tangox.o
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tangox.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tangox.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..630e2b5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tangox.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your
> + * option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#define IRQ0_CTL_BASE 0x0000
> +#define IRQ1_CTL_BASE 0x0100
> +#define EDGE_CTL_BASE 0x0200
> +#define IRQ2_CTL_BASE 0x0300
> +
> +#define IRQ_CTL_HI 0x18
> +#define EDGE_CTL_HI 0x20
> +
> +#define IRQ_STATUS 0x00
> +#define IRQ_RAWSTAT 0x04
> +#define IRQ_EN_SET 0x08
> +#define IRQ_EN_CLR 0x0c
> +#define IRQ_SOFT_SET 0x10
> +#define IRQ_SOFT_CLR 0x14
> +
> +#define EDGE_STATUS 0x00
> +#define EDGE_RAWSTAT 0x04
> +#define EDGE_CFG_RISE 0x08
> +#define EDGE_CFG_FALL 0x0c
> +#define EDGE_CFG_RISE_SET 0x10
> +#define EDGE_CFG_RISE_CLR 0x14
> +#define EDGE_CFG_FALL_SET 0x18
> +#define EDGE_CFG_FALL_CLR 0x1c
> +
> +struct tangox_irq_chip {
> + void __iomem *base;
> + unsigned long ctl;
> +};
> +
> +static inline u32 intc_readl(struct tangox_irq_chip *chip, int reg)
> +{
> + return readl_relaxed(chip->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void intc_writel(struct tangox_irq_chip *chip, int reg, u32 val)
> +{
> + writel_relaxed(val, chip->base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void tangox_dispatch_irqs(struct irq_domain *dom, unsigned int status,
> + int base)
> +{
> + unsigned int hwirq;
> + unsigned int virq;
> +
> + while (status) {
> + hwirq = __ffs(status);
> + virq = irq_find_mapping(dom, base + hwirq);

You may want to check virq in case you get interrupts from unexpected
sources (unlikely, but still).

> + generic_handle_irq(virq);
> + status &= ~BIT(hwirq);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void tangox_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_domain *dom = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *host_chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> + struct tangox_irq_chip *chip = dom->host_data;
> + unsigned int status_lo, status_hi;
> +
> + chained_irq_enter(host_chip, desc);
> +
> + status_lo = intc_readl(chip, chip->ctl + IRQ_STATUS);
> + status_hi = intc_readl(chip, chip->ctl + IRQ_CTL_HI + IRQ_STATUS);
> +
> + tangox_dispatch_irqs(dom, status_lo, 0);
> + tangox_dispatch_irqs(dom, status_hi, 32);
> +
> + chained_irq_exit(host_chip, desc);
> +}
> +
> +static int tangox_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + struct tangox_irq_chip *chip = gc->domain->host_data;
> + struct irq_chip_regs *regs = &gc->chip_types[0].regs;
> +
> + switch (flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_RISE_SET, d->mask);
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_FALL_CLR, d->mask);
> + break;
> +
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_RISE_CLR, d->mask);
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_FALL_SET, d->mask);
> + break;
> +
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_RISE_CLR, d->mask);
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_FALL_CLR, d->mask);
> + break;
> +
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_RISE_SET, d->mask);
> + intc_writel(chip, regs->type + EDGE_CFG_FALL_SET, d->mask);
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + pr_err("Invalid trigger mode %x for IRQ %d\n",
> + flow_type, d->irq);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return irq_setup_alt_chip(d, flow_type);
> +}
> +
> +static void __init tangox_irq_init_chip(struct irq_chip_generic *gc,
> + unsigned long ctl_offs,
> + unsigned long edge_offs)
> +{
> + struct tangox_irq_chip *chip = gc->domain->host_data;
> + struct irq_chip_type *ct = gc->chip_types;
> + unsigned long ctl_base = chip->ctl + ctl_offs;
> + unsigned long edge_base = EDGE_CTL_BASE + edge_offs;
> + int i;
> +
> + gc->reg_base = chip->base;
> + gc->unused = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + ct[i].chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
> + ct[i].chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg;
> + ct[i].chip.irq_mask_ack = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg_and_ack;
> + ct[i].chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_unmask_enable_reg;
> + ct[i].chip.irq_set_type = tangox_irq_set_type;
> + ct[i].chip.name = gc->domain->name;
> +
> + ct[i].regs.enable = ctl_base + IRQ_EN_SET;
> + ct[i].regs.disable = ctl_base + IRQ_EN_CLR;
> + ct[i].regs.ack = edge_base + EDGE_RAWSTAT;
> + ct[i].regs.type = edge_base;
> + }
> +
> + ct[0].type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK;
> + ct[0].handler = handle_level_irq;
> +
> + ct[1].type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
> + ct[1].handler = handle_edge_irq;
> +
> + intc_writel(chip, ct->regs.disable, 0xffffffff);
> + intc_writel(chip, ct->regs.ack, 0xffffffff);
> +}
> +
> +static void __init tangox_irq_domain_init(struct irq_domain *dom)
> +{
> + struct irq_chip_generic *gc;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + gc = irq_get_domain_generic_chip(dom, i * 32);
> + tangox_irq_init_chip(gc, i * IRQ_CTL_HI, i * EDGE_CTL_HI);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int __init tangox_irq_init(void __iomem *base, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + struct tangox_irq_chip *chip;
> + struct irq_domain *dom;
> + const char *name;
> + u32 ctl;
> + int irq;
> + int err;
> + int i;
> +
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + if (!irq)
> + panic("%s: failed to get IRQ", node->name);
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "sigma,reg-offset", &ctl))
> + panic("%s: failed to get reg base", node->name);

My DT foo is a bit crap, but I'm sure there is ways to express ranges
inside a region that do not require to have vendor-specific properties.
Mark?

> +
> + if (of_property_read_string(node, "label", &name))
> + name = node->name;

Do you really need this cosmetic thing? node->name should be enough for
everybody, and the "label" has nothing to do with the HW description.

> +
> + chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> + chip->ctl = ctl;
> + chip->base = base;
> +
> + dom = irq_domain_add_linear(node, 64, &irq_generic_chip_ops, chip);
> + if (!dom)
> + panic("%s: failed to create irqdomain", node->name);
> +
> + err = irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips(dom, 32, 2, name, handle_level_irq,
> + 0, 0, 0);
> + if (err)
> + panic("%s: failed to allocate irqchip", node->name);
> +
> + tangox_irq_domain_init(dom);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 64; i++)
> + irq_create_mapping(dom, i);

/me puzzled. What's that for? You really should never need something
like this.

> +
> + irq_set_chained_handler(irq, tangox_irq_handler);
> + irq_set_handler_data(irq, dom);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __init tangox_of_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + struct device_node *c;
> + void __iomem *base;
> +
> + base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(node, c)
> + tangox_irq_init(base, c);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(tangox_intc, "sigma,smp8642-intc", tangox_of_irq_init);
>

Thanks,

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-20 11:21    [W:0.850 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site