Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:07:18 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer |
| |
On 06/02/2014 05:02 PM, josh@joshtriplett.org wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: >>> On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>>>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c >>>>> >>>>> RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK >>>>> M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>>> +R: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> >>>>> L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> S: Supported >>>>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git >>>> >>>> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel >>>> change is useful. >>>> >>>> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more >>>> meaning and hence is probably better. >>>> >>>> But why not "Cc:"? That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly. >> >> Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not? > > Not sure what you mean here. Responding to the text you quoted: I have > no particular need to bikeshed the tag name, so if you prefer "Cc" and > can convince get_maintainer.pl to handle it, fine by me.
Sorry, what I meant is that Andrew and I both mentioned copy-paste and you replied earlier (and I have already deleted it) that copy-paste shouldn't be necessary for someone who is using get_maintainer.pl.
Do you redirect its output to your patch file and then edit it or does get_maintainer.pl work with git-send-email or something else? if something else, what is it, please?
thanks, -- ~Randy
| |