Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:02:46 -0700 | From | josh@joshtrip ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rcu: Add Josh Triplett as designated reviewer |
| |
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:38:56PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 06/02/2014 01:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 13:35 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:00:20 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> > >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >>> @@ -7321,6 +7321,7 @@ F: kernel/rcu/torture.c > >>> > >>> RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK > >>> M: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > >>> +R: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> > >>> L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >>> S: Supported > >>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git > >> > >> I like the general principle - knowing who to poke regarding a kernel > >> change is useful. > >> > >> I don't care much whether it's "M:" or "R:", although "R:" carries more > >> meaning and hence is probably better. > >> > >> But why not "Cc:"? That's meaningful too and is more copy-n-paste friendly. > > Josh, what are you assuming that Andrew and I did not?
Not sure what you mean here. Responding to the text you quoted: I have no particular need to bikeshed the tag name, so if you prefer "Cc" and can convince get_maintainer.pl to handle it, fine by me.
- Josh Triplett
| |