| Date | Wed, 23 Apr 2014 11:47:05 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 09/24] input: Port hid-dr to ff-memless-next | From | simon@mungewel ... |
| |
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:14:44PM +0000, madcatxster@devoid-pointer.net > wrote: >> This is another case where even the old code was flawed, right? Should >> I try to stuff the fixes into these patches or would a few extra >> patches addressing these problems be an easier to review solution? I >> can append such patches to the MLNX patchset. > > Changes addressing pre-existing problem should go into separate patches > (preferably applicable first). >
As a by-stander who would like to see MLNX move forward, should it be heldback by pre-existing problems in drivers that the MLNX dev(s) don't have hardware to test against...?
Simon.
|