lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 09/24] input: Port hid-dr to ff-memless-next
From
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 03:14:44PM +0000, madcatxster@devoid-pointer.net
> wrote:
>> This is another case where even the old code was flawed, right? Should
>> I try to stuff the fixes into these patches or would a few extra
>> patches addressing these problems be an easier to review solution? I
>> can append such patches to the MLNX patchset.
>
> Changes addressing pre-existing problem should go into separate patches
> (preferably applicable first).
>

As a by-stander who would like to see MLNX move forward, should it be
heldback by pre-existing problems in drivers that the MLNX dev(s) don't
have hardware to test against...?

Simon.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-23 18:21    [W:0.816 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site