Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:54:56 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support | From | Timur Tabi <> |
| |
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Pins may be muxed to alternate function instead of gpio by firmware. > This driver does not touch the pin muxing and expect firmare > to set pin muxing and pullup/down properties properly. > > Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 12 + > drivers/pinctrl/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 543 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I know it's been ten months since you posted this driver, but I have a question. If this driver does not touch the pin muxing, and it doesn't even call pinctrl_register(), then why is it in drivers/pinctrl? It's not a pinctrl driver. Why isn't this a regular GPIO drivers in drivers/gpio?
-- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.
| |