Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 25 Oct 2014 21:32:01 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: UKSM: What's maintainers think about it? |
| |
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:25:56 +0300 Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good time of day, people. > I try to find 'mm' subsystem specific people and lists, but list > linux-mm looks dead and mail archive look like deprecated. > If i must to sent this message to another list or add CC people, let me know.
linux-mm@kvack.org is alive and well.
> If questions are already asked (i can't find activity before), feel > free to kick me. > > The main questions: > 1. Somebody test it? I see many reviews about it. > I already port it to latest linux-next-git kernel and its work without issues. > http://pastebin.com/6FMuKagS > (if it matter, i can describe use cases and results, if somebody ask it) > > 2. Developers of UKSM already tried to merge it? Somebody talked with uksm devs? > offtop: now i try to communicate with dev's on kerneldedup.org forum, > but i have problems with email verification and wait admin > registration approval. > (i already sent questions to > http://kerneldedup.org/forum/home.php?mod=space&username=xianai , > because him looks like team leader) > > 3. I just want collect feedbacks from linux maintainers team, if you > decide what UKSM not needed in kernel, all other comments (as i > understand) not matter. > > Like KSM, but better. > UKSM - Ultra Kernel Samepage Merging > http://kerneldedup.org/en/projects/uksm/introduction/
It's the first I've heard of it. No, as far as I know there has been no attempt to upstream UKSM.
| |