lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: UKSM: What's maintainers think about it?
    Hi All,

    I'm not mantainer at all, but I've being using UKSM for a long time and remember
    to port it to 3.16 family once.
    UKSM seems good and stable and, at least for me, doesn't raised any errors.
    AFAIK the only limitation I know (maybe I has been fixed already) it isn't able
    to work together with zram stuff due to some race-conditions.

    Cheers,

    Marco A Benatto
    Mandriva OEM Developer


    On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:32:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 22:25:56 +0300 Timofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > > Good time of day, people.
    > > I try to find 'mm' subsystem specific people and lists, but list
    > > linux-mm looks dead and mail archive look like deprecated.
    > > If i must to sent this message to another list or add CC people, let me know.
    >
    > linux-mm@kvack.org is alive and well.
    >
    > > If questions are already asked (i can't find activity before), feel
    > > free to kick me.
    > >
    > > The main questions:
    > > 1. Somebody test it? I see many reviews about it.
    > > I already port it to latest linux-next-git kernel and its work without issues.
    > > http://pastebin.com/6FMuKagS
    > > (if it matter, i can describe use cases and results, if somebody ask it)
    > >
    > > 2. Developers of UKSM already tried to merge it? Somebody talked with uksm devs?
    > > offtop: now i try to communicate with dev's on kerneldedup.org forum,
    > > but i have problems with email verification and wait admin
    > > registration approval.
    > > (i already sent questions to
    > > http://kerneldedup.org/forum/home.php?mod=space&username=xianai ,
    > > because him looks like team leader)
    > >
    > > 3. I just want collect feedbacks from linux maintainers team, if you
    > > decide what UKSM not needed in kernel, all other comments (as i
    > > understand) not matter.
    > >
    > > Like KSM, but better.
    > > UKSM - Ultra Kernel Samepage Merging
    > > http://kerneldedup.org/en/projects/uksm/introduction/
    >
    > It's the first I've heard of it. No, as far as I know there has been
    > no attempt to upstream UKSM.
    >
    > --
    > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
    > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
    > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
    > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-10-28 15:21    [W:2.221 / U:0.284 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site