| Date | Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:31:25 +0200 | From | Andrew Lunn <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 069/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines |
| |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:30:15PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines > and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used > by cpufreq drivers then. > > This patch uses these generic routines for this driver. > > Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 22 +++------------------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Hi Viresh
You can add:
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
to
[PATCH 069/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routines [PATCH 107/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core [PATCH 161/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: Convert to light weight ->target_index() routine [PATCH 195/228] cpufreq: kirkwood: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
It does however require the patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg273378.html
but this is not because of this patch series, it was already broken.
Thanks Andrew
|