lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[for-next-3.11][PATCH 0/5] tracing: Final fixes for the race between open event file and deleting event
Oleg,

Is all the races that we are aware of between accessing event files and
deleting events covered by these patches? I think I have them all.
Was there any patches that I missed, as there were a lot of threads
and lots of patches sent out, but not all were considered final.

I think I got the main ones that we decided on, but I'm not 100% sure as
my INBOX is overrun by too many activities. It may be a few months before
I go through them all.

I haven't pushed this to my for-next branch as I'm waiting for some feedback
from others in my queue. But I did push it to my ftrace/urgent branch
if you want to look at what will be going there. That branch may rebase
but I wanted to get these patches tested by Fengguang before sending
them to next. And I try not to rebase my for-next branch.

Thanks,

-- Steve


Oleg Nesterov (2):
debugfs: debugfs_remove_recursive() must not rely on list_empty(d_subdirs)
tracing: trace_remove_event_call() should fail if call/file is in use

Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) (3):
tracing: Add comment to describe special break case in probe_remove_event_call()
tracing/kprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are in use
tracing/uprobes: Fail to unregister if probe event files are in use

----
fs/debugfs/inode.c | 69 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 2 +-
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 21 +++++++++----
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-08-02 05:21    [W:0.061 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site