lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Jul]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectBuilding CONFIG_SAMPLES separately.
Hi,

I was wondering if there is a reason the modules under the samples
directory only build if you use the command make uImage modules?

I have created a patch so that they compile if you enable CONFIG_SAMPLES
and then build the kernel separately, i.e.
make uImage
make modules

This two step approach is how the kernel is built if you use bitbake in
yocto, currently it does not output the kernel module object file for
the sample modules.

This is the patch I am considering:

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 29339b4..1acd69f 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -772,9 +772,6 @@ vmlinux: scripts/link-vmlinux.sh $(vmlinux-deps) FORCE
ifdef CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK
$(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile headers_check
endif
-ifdef CONFIG_SAMPLES
- $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=samples
-endif
ifdef CONFIG_BUILD_DOCSRC
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=Documentation
endif
@@ -943,6 +940,9 @@ all: modules

PHONY += modules
modules: $(vmlinux-dirs) $(if $(KBUILD_BUILTIN),vmlinux) modules.builtin
+ifdef CONFIG_SAMPLES
+ $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=samples
+endif
$(Q)$(AWK) '!x[$$0]++'
$(vmlinux-dirs:%=$(objtree)/%/modules.order) > $(objtree)/modules.order
@$(kecho) ' Building modules, stage 2.';
$(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/scripts/Makefile.modpost

Thank you for any help or advice,
Jim Baxter


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-07-11 00:06    [W:0.871 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site