| Date | Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:21:42 +0200 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | [ 012/184] usermodehelper: ____call_usermodehelper() doesnt |
| |
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ need do_exit()
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
commit 5b9bd473e3b8a8c6c4ae99be475e6e9b27568555 upstream
Minor cleanup. ____call_usermodehelper() can simply return, no need to call do_exit() explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [dannf: adjusted to apply to Debian's 2.6.32] Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> --- kernel/kmod.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c index 2c2a020..f12d883 100644 --- a/kernel/kmod.c +++ b/kernel/kmod.c @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void *data) /* Exec failed? */ sub_info->retval = retval; - do_exit(0); + return 0; } void call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(struct subprocess_info *info) -- 1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty
|