Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:30:26 +0530 | From | Kishon Vijay Abraham I <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators |
| |
On Friday 21 June 2013 06:55 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:56 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> >>> Have you added the regulator supply entries? >>> Are you testing on mainline linux-next? >> Not in linux-next :-( Tested only with mainline. >> Does inverting the order helps? >> > > I think because you do not have entry of supply in your dt node, it gets > ignored by regulator_dev_lookup() and continue. > > I made the entry like (added entry form smps10-out2-supply and smps10-in-supply > in dt node) and then it failed. > /*** > > + smps10-out2-supply = <&palmas_smps10_out2_reg>; > + smps10-in-supply = <&tps65090_dcdc3_reg>; > ldo3-in-supply = <&palmas_smps3_reg>; > @@ -903,6 +905,20 @@ > regulator-always-on; > }; > > + palmas_smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 { > + regulator-name = "smps10_out1"; > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; > + regulator-always-on; > + }; > + > + palmas_smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 { > + regulator-name = "smps10_out2"; > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; > + regulator-always-on; > + }; > + > **/ > > > After reversing the sequence, it worked fine.
You mean, changing the order in dt node helped?
Thanks Kishon
| |