Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:55:28 +0530 | From | Laxman Dewangan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators |
| |
On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:56 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> >> Have you added the regulator supply entries? >> Are you testing on mainline linux-next? > Not in linux-next :-( Tested only with mainline. > Does inverting the order helps? >
I think because you do not have entry of supply in your dt node, it gets ignored by regulator_dev_lookup() and continue.
I made the entry like (added entry form smps10-out2-supply and smps10-in-supply in dt node) and then it failed. /***
+ smps10-out2-supply = <&palmas_smps10_out2_reg>; + smps10-in-supply = <&tps65090_dcdc3_reg>; ldo3-in-supply = <&palmas_smps3_reg>; @@ -903,6 +905,20 @@ regulator-always-on; };
+ palmas_smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 { + regulator-name = "smps10_out1"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + palmas_smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 { + regulator-name = "smps10_out2"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + **/
After reversing the sequence, it worked fine.
| |