Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:12:22 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework |
| |
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2013-03-27 02:08:15) > > I wonder if it would make sense to abstract these operations in a generic > > recursive mutex. Given that it would delay this patch past v3.10 I won't push > > for that. > > > > Having a nice implementation of recursive mutexes would have saved me > some time.
If you encapsulate stuff nicely like I suggested, then switching to a generic version later on is a nobrainer.
Thanks,
tglx
| |