[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call (v2)
Sorry misunderstood your offlist mail   I can cook up an x32 binary easily enough.

Meredydd Luff <> wrote:

>On 2 Aug 2012 00:33, "H. Peter Anvin" <> wrote:
>> > Sorry, you're right. The argument vector needs compatibility
>> >
>> > This means you need an x32 version of the function
>This is why I originally asked you (off-list) whether it was okay to
>x32 support in the initial patch :)
>I have x32 code already, but I don't have the toolchain or glibc to
>it. (Nor the pain tolerance to build the bleeding-edge versions on this
>laptop - unless I really, really need to...)
>If you (or someone else with a working x32 toolchain) could build a
>binary from a tiny test program, I could test that code and put it back
>the patch.

Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-02 03:21    [W:0.081 / U:31.288 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site