lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call (v2)
    From
    Date
    Sorry misunderstood your offlist mail   I can cook up an x32 binary easily enough.

    Meredydd Luff <meredydd@senatehouse.org> wrote:

    >On 2 Aug 2012 00:33, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
    >> > Sorry, you're right. The argument vector needs compatibility
    >support.
    >> >
    >> > This means you need an x32 version of the function
    >
    >This is why I originally asked you (off-list) whether it was okay to
    >omit
    >x32 support in the initial patch :)
    >
    >I have x32 code already, but I don't have the toolchain or glibc to
    >test
    >it. (Nor the pain tolerance to build the bleeding-edge versions on this
    >laptop - unless I really, really need to...)
    >
    >If you (or someone else with a working x32 toolchain) could build a
    >static
    >binary from a tiny test program, I could test that code and put it back
    >in
    >the patch.
    >
    >Meredydd

    --
    Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-08-02 03:21    [W:0.023 / U:59.640 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site