[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call (v2)
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Al Viro <> wrote:
> FWIW, I've just pushed (completely untested) arm and alpha
> parts of what I described into signal.git#execve2; x86 is
> next. Note that after that sys_execve() is identical on
> converted architectures and can be merged; ditto for
> kernel_execve(). After I do x86 counterpart, I'll
> take those guys to fs/exec.c under ifdef for new __ARCH_HAS_...
> (and define it on already converted ones, obviously).
> Then your patch goes there, except that implementation
> gets put into fs/exec.c, under the same ifdef. And with
> current_pt_regs() used instead of the extra argument,
> of course. From that point on it can be used on any converted
> architecture.

OK, that makes sense to me.

What would you need from me, and when? Should I just wait for your
#ifdef-ed sys_execve() in fs/exec.c, and re-spin the patch based on

Is there anything else I can/should do in the meantime to make this
patch acceptable?


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-02 13:41    [W:0.029 / U:4.856 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site