lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[RFC PATCH] block: all callers should check blkdev_issue_flush's return
Date
It is concerning that a FLUSH may fail but the blkdev_issue_flush
callers assume it will always succeed.

Each blkdev_issue_flush caller should come to terms with the reality
that a FLUSH may fail -- the file_operations' .fsync methods in
particular. nilfs2 is the only filesystem that checks
blkdev_issue_flush's return.

Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index ba43f40..76d6e48 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static inline struct request *blk_map_queue_find_tag(struct blk_queue_tag *bqt,

#define BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE 0x01 /* secure discard */

-extern int blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *, gfp_t, sector_t *);
+extern int __must_check blkdev_issue_flush(struct block_device *, gfp_t, sector_t *);
extern int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags);
extern int blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
--
1.7.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-26 18:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans