lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH] KVM: Use IRQF_ONESHOT for assigned device MSI interrupts
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:22 PM
> To: Avi Kivity
> Cc: Jan Kiszka; Thomas Gleixner; Alex Williamson; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
> mtosatti@redhat.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Ren, Yongjie
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Use IRQF_ONESHOT for assigned device MSI
> interrupts
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:01:41PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 06/08/2012 05:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Pls correct me if I'm wrong.
> > >
> > > Well, IIRC, the "don't loop over all vcpus with IRQs or preemption
> > > disabled" was one argument against direct legacy interrupt injection as
> > > well. That's what I kept in mind from those discussions. Maybe Avi can
> > > comment on the current position.
> >
> > It's still my position.
> >
> > IMO we need something like struct gfn_to_hva_cache for interrupts. If
> > it's in the cache, we fast-path it from the interrupt handler. If not,
> > fall back to a workqueue and let it refill the cache.
>
> And you class the irqfd behaviour of injecting multicast
> with interrupts disabled a bug then?
>
Hi Avi & Michael,
Any more news on this issue ?

> > --
> > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-18 11:21    [W:0.081 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site