lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] KVM: Use IRQF_ONESHOT for assigned device MSI interrupts
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:01:41PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 05:50 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Pls correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > Well, IIRC, the "don't loop over all vcpus with IRQs or preemption
> > disabled" was one argument against direct legacy interrupt injection as
> > well. That's what I kept in mind from those discussions. Maybe Avi can
> > comment on the current position.
>
> It's still my position.
>
> IMO we need something like struct gfn_to_hva_cache for interrupts. If
> it's in the cache, we fast-path it from the interrupt handler. If not,
> fall back to a workqueue and let it refill the cache.

And you class the irqfd behaviour of injecting multicast
with interrupts disabled a bug then?

> --
> error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-11 13:01    [W:0.819 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site