lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: missing leap second patches in stable.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:09:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:48:34AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes
> > > in that area are present. With the leap second just two weeks away,
> > > it seems like they should be.
> > >
> > > Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable,
> > > (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).
> >
> > So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday.
> > So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable
> > on the first TAI offset fix.
> >
> > I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg. Thanks for the close
> > review here!
>
> fwiw, I did a test on 3.5rc2 yesterday where I forced a fake leap second at midnight.
> Nothing untoward happened, unlike the previous ones :-)

Out of curiosity, how do you test that? Do you have any programs
specifically for testing the leap second issue?

Thanks,
Richard




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-16 08:21    [W:0.069 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site