Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 16 Jun 2012 07:50:09 +0200 | From | Richard Cochran <> | Subject | Re: missing leap second patches in stable. |
| |
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 03:09:59PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:48:34AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > > > Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes > > > in that area are present. With the leap second just two weeks away, > > > it seems like they should be. > > > > > > Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable, > > > (haven't checked earlier -stable trees). > > > > So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday. > > So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable > > on the first TAI offset fix. > > > > I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg. Thanks for the close > > review here! > > fwiw, I did a test on 3.5rc2 yesterday where I forced a fake leap second at midnight. > Nothing untoward happened, unlike the previous ones :-)
Out of curiosity, how do you test that? Do you have any programs specifically for testing the leap second issue?
Thanks, Richard
| |