Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:48:34 -0700 | From | John Stultz <> | Subject | Re: missing leap second patches in stable. |
| |
On 06/15/2012 08:20 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > Should these be in -stable ? Looks like all the other recent changes > in that area are present. With the leap second just two weeks away, > it seems like they should be. > > Looks like 6b43ae8a619d17c4935c3320d2ef9e92bdeed05d is in 3.4-stable, > (haven't checked earlier -stable trees).
So the second patch has been sent out for stable review as of yesterday. So it should be on its way, but you're right that I forgot to CC stable on the first TAI offset fix.
I'll generate the patch and send it to Greg. Thanks for the close review here!
thanks -john
| |