[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Removal of lumpy reclaim
On 04/09/2012 03:18 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:

>> I could see NOMMU being unable to use compaction, but
> Yes, COMPACTION depends on MMU.
>> chances are lumpy reclaim would be sufficient for that
>> configuration, anyway...
> That's an argument for your patch in 3.4-rc, which uses lumpy only
> when !COMPACTION_BUILD. But here we're worrying about Mel's patch,
> which removes the lumpy code completely.

Sorry, that was a typo in my mail.

I wanted to say that I expect lumpy reclaim to NOT be
sufficient for NOMMU anyway, because it cannot reclaim
lumps of memory large enough to fit a new process.

All rights reversed

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-10 01:43    [W:0.052 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site