[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Removal of lumpy reclaim
    On 04/06/2012 04:31 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
    > On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:21 +0100
    >> Mel Gorman<> wrote:
    >>> (cc'ing active people in the thread "[patch 68/92] mm: forbid lumpy-reclaim
    >>> in shrink_active_list()")
    >>> In the interest of keeping my fingers from the flames at LSF/MM, I'm
    >>> releasing an RFC for lumpy reclaim removal.
    >> I grabbed them, thanks.
    > I do have a concern with this: I was expecting lumpy reclaim to be
    > replaced by compaction, and indeed it is when CONFIG_COMPACTION=y.
    > But when CONFIG_COMPACTION is not set, we're back to 2.6.22 in
    > relying upon blind chance to provide order>0 pages.

    Is this an issue for any architecture?

    I could see NOMMU being unable to use compaction, but
    chances are lumpy reclaim would be sufficient for that
    configuration, anyway...

    All rights reversed

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-04-09 20:13    [W:0.019 / U:27.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site