Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:12:52 +0100 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | [PATCH 0/2] uprobes: pre-filtering |
| |
Hello.
On top of preparations I sent a month ago. Srikar, you still didn't review the last 2 patches. I assume you do not care so I am going to add them without your ack.
Initially I was going to send more patches in this series. We can add some optimizations to avoid the unnecessary register_for_each_vma() or even consumer->filter() if there is a consumer with ->filter == NULL. But lets do this later, lets discuss the functional change first.
Next steps:
- teach handler_chain() to remove the unwanted breakpoints
- if the above is not enough, implement UPROBE_FILTER_FORK
- implement uprobe_apply(consumer, task, is_register) ?
Ole.
| |