lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH 0/7] PM / QoS: Support for PM QoS device flags
Date
Hi All,

On Friday 28 of September 2012 23:51:10 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> The following patch series extends the existing device PM QoS core code to
> support PM QoS flags representing binary (on/off) requirements, such as
> whether or not power may be removed entirely from the device or whether
> or not remote wakeup (i.e. signalling of external events while suspended)
> should work for it.
>
> [1/7] Prepare PM QoS device structure for adding more constraint types.
> [2/7] Introduce request and constraint data types for PM QoS flags.
> [3/7] Prepare struct dev_pm_qos_request for representing more request types.
> [4/7] Introduce device PM QoS flags support.
> [5/7] Make it possible to expose PM QoS device flags to user space.
> [6/7] PM / Domains: Check device PM QoS flags in pm_genpd_poweroff().
> [7/7] PM / ACPI: Take device PM QoS flags into account.
>
> The last two patches make the generic PM domains framework and ACPI / PCI,
> respectively, take the PM QoS device flags introduced by patch [5/7] into
> accont when making their decisions.
>
> The changelogs describe the details, but if anything isn't clear, please let
> me know.

Time for a real submission, it seems. :-)

The changes since the previous iteration are addressed comments and a small
optimization in patch [5/7] (it won't resume the device if the setting is not
going to change in dev_pm_qos_update_flags()).

Thanks,
Rafael


--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-08 11:01    [W:0.140 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site