lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: no tree for Sept 6
From
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> With master.kernel.org down, there is not much change from yesterday and
>>> I cannot publish the resulting linux-next tree anyway, so there is no
>>> tree today.
>>>
>> What about github ? gitorious ?
>>
>> If you fork linus' tree on github, you should still be within the disk
>> usage limit. My linux-2.6-next.git bare tree mirror is about 303MB.
>
> Well... that would be helpful if all of the trees that linux-next
> pulls from are hosted somewhere other than kernel.org as well.  A lot
> of them are not, which means you would get an incomplete linux-next
> tree at best.  Probably better to just wait.
>
That's just insane...

git is distributed, but still used centrally. Kernel development
should just not be impacted by such issues.

- Arnaud
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-06 19:31    [W:0.059 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site