Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:51:51 -0400 (EDT) | From | Doug Ledford <> | Subject | Re: [159/244] ipc/mqueue.c: fix mq_open() return value |
| |
----- Original Message ----- > Um, that's the way this patch is upstream, right? So perhaps it > should > be fixed there first and then I can take the fix into -stable?
Upstream is a bit of a fuzzy statement ;-) It might be in -next, but it's not in Linus' tree or Andrew's -mm tree or else my recent patches would have conflicted. And in fact, upon further reflection, I think maybe that particular test could use being split into two distinct tests. One for wrapping the byte counter, which would return -ENOMEM, and one for exceeding RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE which would return -EPERM (not sure if that's right, I would have to poke around elsewhere, but it seems a better response when you are violating a ulimit than nomem to me anyway).
-- Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> GPG KeyID: CFBFF194 http://people.redhat.com/dledford
| |