lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
Subjectvfat filesystem: Why utf8=1 when iocharset=”utf8 ” was already there?
From
From my opinion both should support the same functionality as the
motive behind this seems to introduce the complete support for utf8.
But, I am surprised to see the behavior changes in the ‘2’ options.
1) When using iocharset=”utf8” it makes vfat case sensitive, while
this is not the case with using utf8=1
2) Surrogate pair don’t work when using iocharset=”utf8”, because that
traverses a path like this:
xlate_to_uni()-->nls->char2uni()-->char2uni()-->utf8_to_utf32()
After this it returns EINVAL because Surrogate pair correct code is
greater than 0xFFFF (MAX_WCHAR_T – limit which is put)
But this is not the case with utf8=1
There are other places also where I can see usage different due to
usage of char2uni()

Can someone provide any help on this? Why do we have separate options
for using utf8 and if utf8=1 smoothly supports proper working then why
not discard iocharset=”utf8” ? and if this is not the case
why was utf8=1 introduced?

Please provide any guidance in this.

Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-02 13:29    [W:0.047 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site