lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] fs, dlm: don't do pointless NULL check and use kzalloc
In fs/dlm/lock.c in the dlm_scan_waiters() function there are 2 small
issues:

1) There's no need to test the return value of the allocation and do a
memset if is succeedes. Just use kzalloc() to obtain zeroed memory.

2) Since kfree() handles NULL pointers gracefully, the test of
'warned' against NULL before the kfree() after the loop is completely
pointless. Remove it.

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Acked-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/lock.c | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index f71d0b5..26d6d88 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -849,9 +849,7 @@ void dlm_scan_waiters(struct dlm_ls *ls)

if (!num_nodes) {
num_nodes = ls->ls_num_nodes;
- warned = kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL, num_nodes * sizeof(int));
- if (warned)
- memset(warned, 0, num_nodes * sizeof(int));
+ warned = kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL, num_nodes * sizeof(int));
}
if (!warned)
continue;
@@ -863,9 +861,7 @@ void dlm_scan_waiters(struct dlm_ls *ls)
dlm_config.ci_waitwarn_us, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid);
}
mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_waiters_mutex);
-
- if (warned)
- kfree(warned);
+ kfree(warned);

if (debug_expired)
log_debug(ls, "scan_waiters %u warn %u over %d us max %lld us",
--
1.7.6


--
Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-02 20:11    [W:0.199 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site