Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:06:34 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM) | From | Josh Boyer <> |
| |
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:> > I have a couple of thoughts here: > > - If this patchset is merged and a major user such as google is > unable to use it and has to continue to carry a separate patch then > that's a regrettable situation for the upstream kernel. > > - Google's is, afaik, the largest use case we know of: zillions of > machines for a number of years. And this real-world experience tells > us that the badram patchset has shortcomings. Shortcomings which we > can expect other users to experience. > > So. What are your thoughts on these issues?
Has Google submitted patches for their implementation?
josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |