[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
On 06/22/2011 12:01 PM, Nancy Yuen wrote:
> Good point. There's the MAX_NODES that expands it, though it's still
> hard coded, and as I understand, intended for NUMA node entries. We
> need anywhere from 8K to 64K 'bad' entries. This creates holes and
> translates to twice as many entries in the e820. We only want to
> allow this memory if it's needed, instead of hard coding it.

It should be dynamic, probably. We can waste memory during early
reclaim, but the memblock stuff should be dynamic.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-22 21:09    [W:0.052 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site