[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
    On 06/22/2011 12:01 PM, Nancy Yuen wrote:
    > Good point. There's the MAX_NODES that expands it, though it's still
    > hard coded, and as I understand, intended for NUMA node entries. We
    > need anywhere from 8K to 64K 'bad' entries. This creates holes and
    > translates to twice as many entries in the e820. We only want to
    > allow this memory if it's needed, instead of hard coding it.

    It should be dynamic, probably. We can waste memory during early
    reclaim, but the memblock stuff should be dynamic.


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-06-22 21:09    [W:0.017 / U:14.720 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site