lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Why move all map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channel to its client?
From
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 09:11:05 +0530, viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com> wrote:
> >>> I thought map_sg/unmap_sg for slave channels will be handled according
> >>> to the flags passed in prep_slave_sg(). But then i found following patch:
...
> Linus, Dan,
>
> Got it. Thanks for your replies.

JFYI, the old discussion was here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/24/114

---
Atsushi Nemoto


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-06-10 15:23    [W:0.083 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site