[lkml]   [2011]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectX32 syscall number base
in looking at how syscalls are implemented, i see that you've picked a base of 
4096. so syscall numbers [0...4096) are for x86_64 and [4096...-1) are for
x32. this 4096 limit is a bit low isnt it ? seems like the best bet would be
to bisect the available space for each new ABI ...

ARM EABI picked 0x900000 for their base when adding a new ABI ...
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-03-17 09:49    [W:0.052 / U:1.624 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site