Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Oct 2011 17:50:36 -0700 | From | Simon Kirby <> | Subject | Re: Linux 3.1-rc9 |
| |
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@ void thread_group_cputimer(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times); > static inline void thread_group_cputime_init(struct signal_struct *sig) > { > raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.lock); > + raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.runtime_lock);
My 3.1-rc9 tree has just spin_lock_init() here, not raw_*.
Which tree is your patch against? -next or something?
It applies with some cooking like this, but will it be right?
> sed s/raw_// ../sched-patch-noraw.diff | patch -p1 --dry patching file include/linux/sched.h Hunk #1 succeeded at 503 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 512 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 2568 (offset -5 lines). patching file kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c patching file kernel/sched_stats.h
Simon-
| |