Messages in this thread | | | From | "Koul, Vinod" <> | Date | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:55:15 +0530 | Subject | RE: [PATCH 1/3] DMAENGINE: generic slave channel control v2 |
| |
> > + * @private_config: if you need to pass in specialized configuration > > + * at runtime, apart from the generic things supported in this > > + * struct, you provide it in this pointer and dereference it inside > > + * your dmaengine driver to get the proper configuration bits out. > > + * > > Will there be any users of this field initially, I'd just as soon > leave it out? Like I mentioned to Vinod I think requiring > dma_slave_config to be wrapped is a better way to extend this > structure. > I was thinking of moving some of structure fields into this, but yes wrapping this into device specific will be a better way
-Vinod
| |