lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/3] DMAENGINE: generic slave channel control v2
> > + * @private_config: if you need to pass in specialized configuration
> > + * at runtime, apart from the generic things supported in this
> > + * struct, you provide it in this pointer and dereference it inside
> > + * your dmaengine driver to get the proper configuration bits out.
> > + *
>
> Will there be any users of this field initially, I'd just as soon
> leave it out? Like I mentioned to Vinod I think requiring
> dma_slave_config to be wrapped is a better way to extend this
> structure.
>
I was thinking of moving some of structure fields into this, but yes wrapping
this into device specific will be a better way

-Vinod


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-07-23 06:29    [W:0.065 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site