[lkml]   [2010]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/3] DMAENGINE: generic slave channel control v2
    > 2010/7/22 Linus Walleij <>:
    > > This adds an interface to the DMAengine to make it possible to
    > > reconfigure a slave channel at runtime. We add a few foreseen
    > > config parameters to the passed struct, with a void * pointer
    > > for custom per-device or per-platform runtime slave data.
    > BTW Vinod, if you're happy with this API, then please ACK it so
    > Dan has some indication whether it'll fit the Moorestown too.

    Shouldn't this patch remove the private member in dma_chan structure

    Currently chan->private is used for sending slave or similar channel specific
    information. Now if we want to add struct dma_slave_config, then IMHO it
    would make sense to remove private variable and replace with dma_slave_config
    struture. That way we can reuse this struture there as well and if someone wants
    to add more stuff he can use the private_config.

    Dan, what do you think about this?


     \ /
      Last update: 2010-07-22 18:15    [W:0.021 / U:0.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site