Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:52:21 +1000 | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc2 | From | Dave Airlie <> |
| |
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Torsten Kaiser >> <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Torsten Kaiser >>>> <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>> [CC:Jeff+Tejun not removed, because you might want to look at the >>>>> attached dmesgs] >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Linus Torvalds >>>>> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Torsten Kaiser wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The first problem that shows up is, that after the KMS switches to the >>>>>>> correct video mode (1280x1024 for an DVI attached LCD), the display >>>>>>> begins to flicker. Every 1..2 seconds (guesstimated) the display turns >>>>>>> off and on again. Something in the new powersaving? >>>>>> >>>>>> Or maybe a borderline display timing that the display has trouble syncing >>>>>> up with? >>>>> >>>>> With 2.6.34 and any previous KMS kernels the output was always stable. >>>>> (I think, I switch to the radeon KMS on 2.6.32) >>>>> The onscreen menu of the monitor showed 1280x1024@60.2Hz for >>>>> 2.6.35-rc2, if I recall correctly. >>>>> Now back on 2.6.34 its 1280x1024@59.9Hz. >>>> >>>> The pm code shouldn't have any affect as your system only has one >>>> power state, so it never kicks in. It sounds like a display pll >>>> problem, but there haven't been any changes to that code since 2.6.34. >>>> Any chance you could bisect it? >>> >>> Not really. -rc1 did not boot for me (although if I disable v4l that >>> might work), and there is this memory corruption error. >>> >>> Regarding the PLLs, did you see this mail? It contains the >>> drm.debug=15 output from 2.6.34 and 2.6.35-rc2. >>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/6/126 >>> >>> The debug output from radeon_set_pll looks identical. But in 2.6.35 a >>> call to [drm:radeon_legacy_tmds_int_dpms], seems new. >>> >>> The switchoff intervall is ~10 seconds, not 1..2 as I guessed in the first mail. >>> Any idea if there is something in the KMS code that triggers at this intervall? >> >> The new mode probing code happens every 10 seconds, though we >> shouldn't be turning anything on or off with it. >> >> So I suspect the DAC detection table might be doing bad things on your >> hardware, we have had a problem where the dac detect table on one DAC >> would turn the other one off which clearly wasn't what we wanted to >> see. >> , > > The x300 is a non-atom card, so it uses the legacy load detection > routines which do mess with some of the crtc regs. >
Okay I see it now, I'm amazed that I was seeing this issue last week and blaming it on something complete different and only seeing it on one card.
I expect its the same problem I'll try and track down a proper fix for it tomorrow.
Dave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |