lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/9] abstract kvm x86 mmu->n_free_mmu_pages
    On 06/15/2010 04:55 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
    > First of all, I think "free" is a poor name for this value. In
    > this context, it means, "the number of mmu pages which this kvm
    > instance should be able to allocate." To me, "free" implies
    > much more that the objects are there and ready for use. I think
    > "available" is a much better description, especially when you
    > see how it is calculated.
    >
    >

    Agreed. Note that if reclaim is improved, we can drop it completely and
    let the kernel trim the cache when it grows too large.

    --
    error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2010-06-16 10:43    [W:0.019 / U:181.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site