[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/9] abstract kvm x86 mmu->n_free_mmu_pages
On 06/15/2010 04:55 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> First of all, I think "free" is a poor name for this value. In
> this context, it means, "the number of mmu pages which this kvm
> instance should be able to allocate." To me, "free" implies
> much more that the objects are there and ready for use. I think
> "available" is a much better description, especially when you
> see how it is calculated.

Agreed. Note that if reclaim is improved, we can drop it completely and
let the kernel trim the cache when it grows too large.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-16 10:43    [W:0.134 / U:5.952 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site