Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:40:40 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/9] abstract kvm x86 mmu->n_free_mmu_pages |
| |
On 06/15/2010 04:55 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > First of all, I think "free" is a poor name for this value. In > this context, it means, "the number of mmu pages which this kvm > instance should be able to allocate." To me, "free" implies > much more that the objects are there and ready for use. I think > "available" is a much better description, especially when you > see how it is calculated. > >
Agreed. Note that if reclaim is improved, we can drop it completely and let the kernel trim the cache when it grows too large.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| |