lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2010]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/9] abstract kvm x86 mmu->n_free_mmu_pages
On 06/15/2010 04:55 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> First of all, I think "free" is a poor name for this value. In
> this context, it means, "the number of mmu pages which this kvm
> instance should be able to allocate." To me, "free" implies
> much more that the objects are there and ready for use. I think
> "available" is a much better description, especially when you
> see how it is calculated.
>
>

Agreed. Note that if reclaim is improved, we can drop it completely and
let the kernel trim the cache when it grows too large.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2010-06-16 10:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans