[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:39:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Which begs the question why _is_ UML sucking in x86 stuff and can anyone
> provide us with some sensible reasons? Because if there aren't any, it
> is their includes that should be fixed. Let me see what I can do to
> redirect hweight stuff properly...

Generally, UML pulls in the host arch headers because they work. When
they are only architecture-dependent (and not, say, depending on the
host task struct or something), they're fine.

What's the include path from UML to the x86 hweight stuff?


Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com

 \ /
  Last update: 2010-05-31 16:15    [W:0.120 / U:0.868 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site