[lkml]   [2010]   [May]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash
    On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:39:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
    > Which begs the question why _is_ UML sucking in x86 stuff and can anyone
    > provide us with some sensible reasons? Because if there aren't any, it
    > is their includes that should be fixed. Let me see what I can do to
    > redirect hweight stuff properly...

    Generally, UML pulls in the host arch headers because they work. When
    they are only architecture-dependent (and not, say, depending on the
    host task struct or something), they're fine.

    What's the include path from UML to the x86 hweight stuff?


    Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com

     \ /
      Last update: 2010-05-31 16:15    [W:0.021 / U:0.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site