Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 May 2010 22:32:12 -0400 | From | Jeff Dike <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86, hweight: Fix UML boot crash |
| |
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:39:56PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Which begs the question why _is_ UML sucking in x86 stuff and can anyone > provide us with some sensible reasons? Because if there aren't any, it > is their includes that should be fixed. Let me see what I can do to > redirect hweight stuff properly...
Generally, UML pulls in the host arch headers because they work. When they are only architecture-dependent (and not, say, depending on the host task struct or something), they're fine.
What's the include path from UML to the x86 hweight stuff?
Jeff
-- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
| |