Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:24:34 -0500 (EST) | From | Ari Entlich <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Add a new VT mode which is like VT_PROCESS but doesn't require a VT_RELDISP ioctl call |
| |
----- "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: > That would just as well. It just needs to be obvious for future > maintainers that the overlap doesn't matter
Alright, cool. Should I submit two patches (one for the define move and one for the actual patch), or would one patch be fine?
Ari
| |